REPRESENTATION OF ARCHEOLOGY IN THE UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE LIST: CASE OF TURKEY
PDF (Türkçe)

Keywords

UNESCO
World Heritage List
Archaeology UNESCO
Dünya Miras Listesi
Arkeoloji

How to Cite

ERASLAN, Şehnaz. (2020). REPRESENTATION OF ARCHEOLOGY IN THE UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE LIST: CASE OF TURKEY. JOURNAL OF AWARENESS, 5(2), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.26809/joa.5.010

Abstract

The main purpose of the UNESCO World Heritage List is to preserve the cultural and natural heritage considered to be of ‘outstanding universal value’ throughout the world and to transfer it to future generations. However, the current list includes thematic, geographical and chronologically unequal distribution. Since 1994“Global Strategy for a Representative, Balanced and Credible World Heritage List)”, adopted by the World Heritage Committee, has guided the states parties to improve the list in the balance of representation. 

In this article, in order to contribute the strategies of UNESCO, Turkey's Archaeological heritage represented in World Heritage List and Tentative List were evaluated. After providing brief information about the World Heritage List, the representation rates of heritage in the both list were examined considering sub-disciplines of archaeology and various suggestions were discussed in order to achieve a more balanced distribution.

https://doi.org/10.26809/joa.5.010%20%20%20
PDF (Türkçe)

References

AYTEK, A.H., (2017), “Paleolitik Dönem Anadolu Fosil İnsan Buluntuları” AÜDTCF, Antropoloji Dergisi, Sayı:34:19–30.

BANDARİN, F., (2007), “Looking ahead: the World Heritage Convention in the twenty-first century”. In: S. Labadi (director). World heritage – Challenges for the millennium. Paris: UNESCO World Heritage Centre, 192–196.

CAMERON, C - RÖSSLER, M., (2013), Many Voices, One Vision: The Early History of the World Heritage Convention. Farnham, Surrey, UK: Ashgate.

CLEERE, H., (1996), “The Concept of 'Outstanding Universal Value in the World Heritage Convention” Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites (1996) Volume 1:227-233.

FREY, B & STEİNER, L., (2011), “World Heritage List: Does it make sense?” International Journal of Cultural Policy, Vol. 17, No. 5 (2011): 555–573.

ICOMOS (1986) , UNESCO World Heritage Center “Advisory Body Evaluation” (ICOMOS) https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/377/documents/ Erişim Tarihi: 2 Aralık 2019.

ICOMOS (2005), “The World Heritage List: Filling the Gaps-An Action Plan for Future”, www.international.icomos.org/world_heritage/whlgaps.htm.adresinden Erişim Tarihi: 2 Aralık 2019.

ICOMOS (2008), “Submission by ICOMOS, Reflection Workshop on The Future of The World Heritage Convention” http://www.icomos.no/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/WHC-reflection-workshop.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 20 Aralık 2019.

ICOMOS (2011),” World Heritage Hominid Sites”, Prepared and edited by UNESCO-ICOMOS Documentation Centre. Updated by Francesca Giliberto. UNESCO-ICOMOS Documentation Centre.Paris.

ICOMOS (2017), UNESCO World Heritage Center “Advisory Body Evaluation” (ICOMOS) http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1519/documents/ Erişim Tarihi: 15 Aralık 2019.

ICOMOS (2018), UNESCO World Heritage Center “Advisory Body Evaluation” (ICOMOS) https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1572/documents/ Erişim Tarihi: 2 Aralık 2019.

JOKİLEHTO, J., (2006), “World Heritage: Defining the outstanding universal value”. City & Time 2 (2): 1-10.

JOKİLEHTO, J., (2008), “The World Heritage List: what is OUV? Defining the Outstanding Universal Value of Cultural World Heritage Properties” Paris: An ICOMOS study compiled by Jukka Jokilehto, with contributions from Christina Cameron, Michel Parent and Michael Petzet. International Secretariat of ICOMOS, Paris.

KÖKTEN, İ.K., (1963), “Karain’in Türkiye Prehistoryası’ndaki Yeri”, Türkiye Coğrafya Dergisi, XVIII – XIX, sayı 22-23:17-27.

LABADİ, S., (2005), “A review of the Global Strategy for a Balanced, Representative and Credible World Heritage List, 1994–2004”. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 7:89–102.

MESKELL, L., (2002), “Negative Heritage and Past Mastering in Archeology”. Anthropological Quarterly, 75: 557–574

POSHYANANDANA, S., (2019), “Serial Cultural Heritage: Concept, Applications, Categorization and Its Roles in Present Day Contexts”, Journal of Environmental Design and Planning Volume 16, 69-84.

RAO, K., (2010), “A New Paradigm for the Identification, Nomination and Inscription of Properties on the World Heritage List”. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16: 161–72.

SHACKLEY, M., (2006), Visitor Management: Case Studies from World Heritage Site. Oxford,England: Butterworth-Heinemann

SLATYER, R.O., (1983), “The Origin and Evolution of the World Heritage Committee”. Ambio, 12 (3/4), 138–140.

STRASSER, P., (2002), “Putting Reform Into Action– Thirty Years of the World Heritage Convention: How to Reform a Convention without Changing Its Regulations”. International Journal of Cultural Property 11:215-266.

ŞENYÜREK, M., (1949), “Türk Tarih Kurumu Adına Yapılan Karain Kazısında Bulunan İki Fosil Dişe Dair Kısa Ön Rapor”, Belleten, 52, 833–837.

TAŞKIRAN, H., (2018), “Prehistorik Arkeoloji ve Mağaralar” Mavi Gezegen 24: 63-68.

TİTCHEN, S., (1996), “On the Construction of 'Outstanding Universal Value' Some comments on the Implementation of the1972 UNESCO World Heritage Convention” Conservation And Management of Archaeological Sites, Volume 1 Pages 235-242

UNESCO (1972), https://whc.unesco.org/en/conventiontext/ Erişim Tarihi: 4 Aralık 2019.

UNESCO (1977), http://whc.unesco.org/archive/opguide77a.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 4 Aralık 2019.

UNESCO World Heritage Centre, “Global Strategy” http://whc.unesco.org/en/globalstrategy/ Erişim Tarihi: 2 Aralık 2019.

UNESCO (2019), UNESCO World Heritage Centre “Operational guidelines for the implementation of the world heritage convention”. http://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines Erişim Tarihi: 5 Aralık 2019.

YALÇINKAYA, I., TAŞKIRAN, H., KARTAL, M., ÖZÇELİK, K., KÖSEM, M.B., KARTAL, G., (2007), “2005 Yılı Karain Mağarası Kazıları”, 28. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı, 1.Cilt, Dösimm Basımevi, Ankara: 539-558.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2020 Rating Academy Ar-Ge Yazılım Yayıncılık Eğitim Danışmanlık ve Organizasyon Ticaret Ltd. Şti

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.